Jump to content

Talk:GoTenna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Most of this article is a very close paraphrase of the company website pages. It appears to have been created by a WP:SPA with a WP:COI. Toddst1 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the entire section listing the promotional info about the products - it's covered in the history section. Toddst1 (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


You did a good job of cleaning it up and making it brevity - I love good prose. How do we remove the notice on the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beuyscoyote (talkcontribs) 08:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Beuyscoyote (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]


Toddst1 This all looks clean to me, I just cleaned up chronological ordering which was a little misleading, and added some better citations as well. I think this WP:COI template can probably be removed, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.239.207.31 (talk) 04:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 173.239.207.31 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I pulled a bunch of product reviews and just plain articles that mention this product out of the "Awards" section. Awards sections are for real awards, not just positive mentions in the press. Toddst1 (talk) 04:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This looks great! Much cleaner. How does the disclaimer (from Oct 2016) get removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1000:FD28:5031:1AAE:6E18:B239 (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More puffery/COI

[edit]

A WP:SPA IP with an obvious WP:COI has added a bunch of non-notable awards, misplaced external links to product pages and puffery about who the company has hired. I don't think the key hires is at all encyclopedic. I reverted the edit, but the IP edit warred it back in saying "None of this information is false". Just because it isn't false doesn't mean it should be included. I've removed the Non-notable awards but the puffery about the hires persist. Would appreciate other editors' involvement. Toddst1 (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]