Talk:Go90

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

This article whitewashes what happened

Seems there are guardians keeping criticisms out of Thea Erick. How about this [1] article from yesterday. Can’t have this article’s content in here. It cites Angiolet, explains how poorly the product was designed and managed. And the editors who are working for Verizon won’t let a word of this get into the article.70.83.230.212 (talk) 20:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes, the horshitometer his high on this one.184.149.39.3 (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"As of 7/30 go90 will no longer be available. Check our FAQs for more info."

"As of 11:59 pm ET on 7/30/18, Verizon will shut down go90." (archive)

69.181.23.220 (talk) 04:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/go90-shutting-down-verizon-1202860864/ 69.181.23.220 (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated reverts

An editor doesn't like this article when it brings up criticism from reliable sources. He or she doesn't say the content is not supported by sources. Only that it's not to their liking in terms of tone. The article has been stable for months, except for this editors efforts to scrub documented critiques. I'd like other editors to weigh in here.70.83.230.212 (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will weigh in. You are pushing the POV that every statement must paint the service in a negative light by incorporating loaded, informal, sensationalist statements and descriptions into the body text, such as "revolving door", how the sale of AwesomenessTV was described, "categorized the service as being like YouTube but not as good", not crediting specific critics, use of scare quotes, and so on. My version is in a more chronological order, has actual explanations of the insider statements, and uses separate sections (Reception and demise) to express reactions and the fate of the service. There is nothing different in actual content between your insisted version and mine, besides wording and structure. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes are used for accuracy and pulled directly from reliable sources. You've eliminated a lot more than you let on.70.83.230.212 (talk) 23:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the content, but how you use it that gives it a non-neutral feel. ViperSnake151 Talk 03:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]