Talk:Gnomeo & Juliet

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It is okay for this film to have an article now, as the animation is deep into production, with some of the footage being shown at Cannes.The Editor 155 (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page Format

I have added the film’s official site to the external links section, as well as the film’s official Facebook page, in line with the External Links guidline. I have also added Julie Waters & Richard Wilson to the cast, switched Elton John from Producer to Executive Producer and have credited him for “Music by” to more accurately reflect the film’s credits.

I propose, per the Maunaul of Style (Film) restructuring the article to include a Plot headline and a Characters headline. Doing so would help to clear up the article’s lead section. I’ve put together this proposed revision in my Sandbox: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HipJorge/Gnomeo_%26_Juliet. Thoughts? HipJorge (talk) 01:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and restructured the article. If anyone has any thoughts or comments on the changes I'd be happy to discuss them. HipJorge (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Elliot Asked To Direct - Relevant?

Is it relevant that Adam Elliot was asked to directed the film? - Guest, 01:50, 16 January 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.221.39 (talk)

Move?

According to the poster, the movie appears to be Gnomeo & Juliet, rather than Gnomeo and Juliet. Or are there, I dunno, interviews and official sources and stuff that refer to the movie with an and? Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. If you want, please make a Request move. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 13:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Dpmuk (talk) 11:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gnomeo and Juliet → Gnomeo & Juliet — We follow the title (Gnomeo & Juliet) or keep it like this (Gnomeo and Juliet)? Have your say.

I think we should follow the title in the poster.--Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 08:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per MOS:&: "Retain ampersands in titles of works or organizations, such as The Tom & Jerry Show or AT&T." I think it is fair to say that if the guidelines encourage retaining the ampersand when using the title in running prose, we should make sure the article title matches what we use. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We should put use of & in WP:Name so people have guidance on usage. There may at one time have been an objection to using casual or unusual name formats, though I don't think that has been the case for some time. Names of works of art, film, literature, music, bands, etc, are generally portrayed how they are presented. Gnomeo & Juliet is the correct name, so that is the one we should use, though it would be appropriate when creating such articles to also create a redirect from possible searches such as "Gnomeo and Juliet". SilkTork *^YES! 17:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Erik (talk · contribs). JJ98 (Talk) 19:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appears to be the actual name of the movie. Harry Blue5 (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Music by

Just wanted to let you all know that I've added Bernie Taupin under Music by in the infobox, but have specified that it was lyrics that he contributed. I'd also like to point out that Disney is a client of my company, and that while I see this could be a conflict of interest, hopefully everyone agrees that my edit to the page is justified. Thanks! HipJorge (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Home Media

Hey, I think the home media section could use some improvements, so I drafted a copy of a new version here. If I could get some feedback on the draft, that would be great. Thanks.--TravisBernard (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks good enough to go ahead and drop in the article. The only thing I spot that needs a fix is that the date format should be switched to U.S. style, since that's what we have throughout the article (or we could switch the other dates since it's a UK/US co-production, I guess). Isn't there a template for dates that will allow them to display according to the user's regional preference? If I'm not making that up, maybe we should drop that in. If there's any other fine tuning needed, editors with more experience in that sort of section can tweak it (I'm not one of them). It's a significant improvement over the section as it currently stands. Nice work. Millahnna (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see any sort of template in the Manuel of Style, but it looks like consistency, as you mentioned, is important. I'll switch the dates to the US style for now. Is there another template that you are referencing? --TravisBernard (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I'm not certain I'm even remembering correctly. It's something I think I've seen in passing while editing articles. But I could be thinking of something else entirely. I can't seem to track it down so I don't think it's that important. Millahnna (talk) 01:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and made the edits. If you find the template you were referencing, please let me know. Thanks. --TravisBernard (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Frogs Voice

On The Cartoon, The Big Battle, The Black Snake From Power Rangers Megaforce Makes The Frog Eat Plastic And Gives The Frog An Strange Male Voice When All The Zords Are Inside The Frog Says "The Cost Is Clear But I'm Not Clear" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.210.251 (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Box office results

The article reports revenue in an unusual manner: "the film had a worldwide opening of $30.7,000,000, finishing in second place behind Just Go with It ($35.8,000,000).[26][27] However, on its second weekend —Presidents' Day weekend— it topped the worldwide box office (although not being in first place either in North America[28] or overseas[29]) with $29.8,000,000, ahead of Unknown which ranked second ($26.4,000,000)" [bold emphasis added]

Can we get the numbers translated to a recognized format? I would tackle this project but the numbers get stranger as the section goes on. Jnmwiki (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The edits were made - thank you. Jnmwiki (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article could be more comprehensive if insert some up-to-date sources, especially in the "responses to the movie" sectionHeping Zhang (talk) 19:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]