Talk:Gmail/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Gmail. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Gmail open for signups
Just spotted that Gmail is open for signups as of this morning.
I added it to the end of the 'Registration' section, but that section needs a slight re-write (change parts to past tense, etc...) PlazzTT 08:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- What? I'm looking at Gmail right now, and no where is there anything about "open" signups. Proto Dude 19:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, it is. Go to the log in page, and it is right below the username password text fields. They also seem to have switched to google mail from Gmail, though I'm not certain if it's for everyone.James Delgado 00:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Gmail doesn't seem open for signups, at least not in Singapore. I clicked "Sign up for Gmail", and was prompted to enter my mobile phone number. If Gmail has made signups open to all, wouldn't several newspapers report about it? --J.L.W.S. The Special One 06:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Now it is - source [1] and [2] --TheTallOne 11:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Gmail doesn't seem open for signups, at least not in Singapore. I clicked "Sign up for Gmail", and was prompted to enter my mobile phone number. If Gmail has made signups open to all, wouldn't several newspapers report about it? --J.L.W.S. The Special One 06:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Was Gmail open for signups on February 7, 2007? I first saw the Sign Up link on February 13, 2007. Then, on February 14, 2007, Gmail announced it on their Blog. Speedboxer 04:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
On August 9, 2006, Gmail registration is public in Australia. Why did February 7, 2007, it's public in Australia again? Vinhtantran 13:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Mainland China trademarks subsection
Someone inserted information on "Mainland China" under the trademark disputes section, but did not supply evidence that this conflict was disputed, nor even a reference to a source saying this. Should this be left in the article? Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 23:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)