Talk:Glynis Johns/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Etrius ( Us) 01:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 00:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, lets get this review underway. I can see you've edited this page fairly extensively.

Copy-vios

Images

File:GLYNISJohns.jpg The source 404s to Ebay of all things.
File:Johns&CariouinALittleNightMusic.jpg Rights tagged incorrectly, maintenance tag noted
File:Glynis Johns & Gareth Forwood.jpg I highly doubt this is your own work
File:Glynis Johns - still.jpg Source, again, 404s to Ebay
File:GlynisJohnsSignature.png Not your own work, there are ways to license a signature but this is very incorrect. Here is a good example of what to do [1]
File:Glynis Johns with baby on stage.png Justify how this is a work of the Federal Government

Images as a whole need to be either redone or cut. There are multiple issues and I would not be surprised if many of these are copyrighted.

Sourcing

, Johns made several stage appearances throughout the decade.
in which she played the bridesmaid Miranda Bute at Piccadilly Theatre, London.
film Prison Without Bars and 1939 thriller On the Night of the Fire.
Judy in the 1947 British drama film Frieda.
1943, I'll See You Again in 1944, and Fools Rush In in 1946.

Etc... There are a large number of sources missing.

This page is going to quick-fail. I can see that you expanded the page significantly but there needs to be WP:SECONDARY, WP:RELIABLE sourcing for every claim made, especially for WP:BLP. I understand that you may be excited to add images, but you need to make sure that they are licensed and cited properly. Hopefully these notes can help you with further improvement to this page. I just feel as though it would be futile to go line-by-line in the prose since there are a number of glaring issues. Etrius ( Us) 01:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.