Talk:Glymphatic system

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 9 October 2012 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox images

These images are so small as to be thumbnails. However, if you click on them you don't get a larger version. This is especially unfortunate, as the labels are too small to read. Someone worked hard to create the image, and dropped the ball at the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.216.169 (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2013 (UTC) I think the images are fine. The astrocyte image enlarges when you click on it. The other is a video schematic which will enlarge and play in full screen, with labels that are quite clear to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IggyDad (talk • contribs) 18:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was easy to read a few years ago, but those labels are largely unreadable at 1920x1080 or higher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.119.225 (talk) 00:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Current event tag added

I have applied the current event tag to the top, as this is still a relatively recent scientific discovery. The time scale for the meaning of "recent" in scientific research is longer than the typical news cycle, but still worth mentioning at this point for something only first discovered in 2013, and followup studies based on the initial research are still in progress. --DMahalko (talk) 05:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]