Talk:Glossary of card game terms

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glossary of card game terms article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Glossaries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles

Board and table games Mid‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiktionary

Wouldn't this list be better off at Wiktionary? LordVetinari (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Just saw WP:GLOSSARIES. We live and we learn. LordVetinari (talk) 06:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Skat cards-Jacks of Diamonds and Hearts.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing citations

@Tamzin: thank you so much for cleaning that up; you have the patience of a saint! To be honest I came across Template:sfn and thought "what a nice simple way to do citations" without realising that it expected to be linked to Template:Cite book which I find not simple at all and difficult to read when editing. So I've added the missing citations, but haven't templated them. The Hans Jörgel source is used (but not linked) at ref no. 26. Bermicourt (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]