Talk:Glory (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Buffyverse task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Minions" heading change

I changed the topic "Minions" to "Servants" in order to add Doc to the list. Given that he does play a part in Glory's storyline and clearly serves the wishes of Glory he should be listed and linked to on this page. LazerBeem 08:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two beasts?

There are two articles Glorificus and The Beast (Buffyverse). I don't know much about the series (I patrol Beast (disambiguation)). Are these two the same character. Are there two "The Beast"s in the buffyverse? Someone made a link to Glorificus from Beast (disambiguation), and I've changed it to The Beast (Buffyverse). So, that should be resolved there I think, either with a hatnote or something else. I won't be watching this page, but if you have any questions, let me know on my talk page or on the beast dab page. McKay 15:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are definitely different characters, but I would say that Glory is rarely called "the Beast," so linking to her from the beast disambiguation page would cause confusion. Before anyone else complains - yes, I know the monks call her "the Beast," but the Scooby Gang never does to my recollection and no one looking for information on her would search under "beast". --68.173.5.144 (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I'm surprised that Josh Whedon didnt think about naming Glory as a planeswalker and "The Key" to be an ancient artifact that draws power from the last dimension it was used in to open a portal to other dimensions. The only reason that artifact would be too powerful is because it has the capability of permanently creating planar overlays between dimensions. Evil planeswalkers would be the only ones to do this type of destruction. Therefore, the story shouldve changed to where a "Good" planeswalker was the one that banished Glory to the earth realm while not realizing that Glory had implanted the artifact in the earth realm protected by some order so she could someday return if she was actually defeated. (Planeswalkers always have a secondary defense in case the impossible happens) The planeswalker that banished Glory, lets call him Urza, then easily defeated the other 2 and left that certain dimension as most evolved planeswalkers are able to traverse between dimensions without mechanical devices such as "The Key" Therefore, it shouldve been Urza's essence was temparily contained within Giles, which would kill Ben as only a planeswalker are able to kill another planeswalker. This wouldve been my ending to that season as it makes more sense! >.> ----Arkitan September 2012

Fair use rationale for Image:Ben-glory.jpg

Image:Ben-glory.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glorificus (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) → Glory (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) — Glory is the name most commonly used in the series, harmonizes with the rest of the pages. Also, I screwed up an initial move (forgot to change Glorificus to Glory) and as Hqb mentions - the current situation is the worst of both worlds. I agree on both policy and in universe grounds with his comments (and if I were smarter, would have used them myself in my move request). WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 00:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. "Glorificus" was only used by her minions (and inconsistently at that); everyone else referred to her as Glory. A redirect should remain, of course. "Glorificus (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)" is the worst of both worlds: no need to disambiguate if there are no other significant uses of "Glorificus" in Wikipedia. Hqb (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Little Miss Muffet

Should there be something in here about Glory being Little Miss Muffet? Since someone refers to Dawn Summers as "curds and whey", that would suggest that Glory (who wants to "eat" Dawn) is Little Miss Muffet, and that it is she (not Buffy nor Dawn) that is "counting down to 730" - the date when she can return home 82.43.243.26 (talk) 00:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should be something here about Christian parallels. She can't be named like the old testament god, there is a trinitarian parallel, etc. Pretty obvious that Whedon is commenting on the idea of gods in general here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.41.46 (talk) 20:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]