Talk:Gloria Steinem/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lk7t3Yu (talk · contribs) 18:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a good article which meets the six Good Article criteria.

1: It is well-written. Admittedly this is somewhat subjective, but I can say that the article respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct, and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation as applicable.

2: The article is verifiable with no outside research needed; every fact has a reference from reliable sources, and all of them are from reliable sources without original research.

3: This is also somewhat subjective, but I believe this article is broad in its coverage without going into unnecessary detail, while addressing the main points of the subject.

4: It is neutral, neither praising nor condemning Steinem's views, but simply reporting on them, and notes criticism of her, such as by Germaine Greer.

5: It is stable, without any edit wars.

6: It is illustrated by images which are tagged with their copyright status, relevant to the article, and have proper captions.