Jump to content

Talk:Glomeromycota

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ecoriam. Peer reviewers: Changla, Pierrj.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Number of species

[edit]

How many species are in this division? --Savant13 14:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

number of phyla

[edit]

I deleted the reference to "the six recognised fungal phyla" because I thought it was repetition of what anybody that wants to know this can find out from fungus. Secondly, it is misleading as there are plenty of fungi that are not included in these six (e.g. Zoopagomycotina, Kickxellomycotina, etc...), so the true number is 7,8, possibly 9. Opening an article in this way is very waffly. Bendž|Ť 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I certainly appreciate the fact that you edit many of the fungal pages in Wikipedia and are well up on recent literature, but "waffly" really does not apply here. Basically what you are saying is that the group of 67 professional mycologists worldwide from Canada, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, the USA, and the UK, who for the first time ever have reached a consensus based upon recent molecular data, and who hesitated to recognize where Zoopagomycotina etc. go, but did recognized 6 phyla at this time, are waffling. How is citing it this way misleading? Yes, there may be more recognizd in the future, but for now, given the reference, only 6 were "recognized". Heliocybe 12:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHYLA

[edit]

Since when this division/taxomal group of Fungi is called phylum? Biology by S.Mader (1999 and 2008 published biology books suggest that it has to be called Class, not phylum)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.57.148.86 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Schßler et al. (2001, Mycol. Res. 105: 1413–142) established Glomeromycota as a phylum. However, Spatafora et al. (2016, Mycologia 108:1028-1046) placed this taxon as a subphylum in the phylum Mucoromycota. This may be the latest classification so far. Sui-setz (talk) 03:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Glomeromycota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mycology

[edit]

With the aid of a diagram explain the life cycle of glomeromycota division Karreen (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Glomeromycota&oldid=1194951944"