Talk:Globigerinina
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inverted Taxa.
[edit]Rhizaria and Protozoa are inverted from proper relevant postition in the taxobox. The kingdom should be Protozoa, or Protista, and the phylum probably Protozoa as well, if not Sarcodina (Ameobae). Rhizaria is way over ranked. As having essentially emended Rhizopodea, Rhizaria belongs in the same position as Class Rhizaria.
In the meantime I reassigned Foraminfera to Class from Phylum in order to keep Globigerinida as an order, as presented. In no way does Foraminifera qualify as a phylum any more than does Rhizaria qualify as a kingdom. Foraminifera is commonly defined as an order, which means that Globigerinida would have to be redfined as a suborder, the Glorbigerinina, as it is the the Treatise on Invert Paleo Part C Proitsta.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Globigerinida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120616112446/http://www.gsi.ir:80/General/Lang_en/Page_48/Action_FirstPageView/FORAMINIFERIDA.html to http://www.gsi.ir/General/Lang_en/Page_48/Action_FirstPageView/FORAMINIFERIDA.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)