Talk:Global Gaming Expo

Gambling High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

G2E

Recommend adding G2E as an article to jump to this one. ---Ransom (--71.4.51.150 17:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks! ---Ransom (--71.4.51.150 (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Gaming/Gambling: less ambiguous term should be preferred.

The word gaming is linked to the article gambling. Is this on purpose? The term 'gaming' is ambiguous. It could mean a number of different things (basketball, Monopoly, hide & seek, Dungeons and Dragons, tiddlywinks, marbles, hunting preserve upkeep, etc.). While the gambling industry may wish to use the term gaming to describe itself, we should probably use it only in specific names (such as 'Global Gaming Expo') and use the more specific term (gambling) when referring to the industry and the trade show's content. This applies to the American Gaming Association article too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.155.221.10 (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]