Talk:Global Descriptor Table

Computing: Software / Security Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Merging

Could I suggest this be merged into an article generally describing the IA-32 descripter tables, or one about memory protection? GDT is makes for a very short article, and theres a lot of other related stuff that would fit well into one article. Also I going to reference this article from the "IA-32 Intel(R) Architecture Software Developer's Manual, Volume 3A: System Programming Guide". This is pretty much a gospel source. Available as a PDF from Intel(R) website

Jatos 20:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to Merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Local Descriptor Table with Global Descriptor Table, at least. The two data structures are nearly identical, so it would make things easier for everyone (readers and editors alike) to have one article for both. That way, there's no need to guess whether differences between the pages are due to omission/error, or represent actual differences between the two data structures. (Or, you know, to even look for differences between the articles.)

—SamB (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Citation

Citation 1 of the article is now a broken link. Does anyone have an active reference for it?

Pnorton4 (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]