Talk:Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

I moved this article from the hyphenated "International Co-ordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions" to the non-hyphenated "International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions". I did find some uses of the hyphenated version. However, the official website for the parent organization of the committee currently uses the non-hyphenated version. In addition, I found several documents by the ICC itself, and it uses the non-hyphenated version, at least in the documents it has produced in the last few years. Finally, the committee seems to be much more often referred to by its non-hyphenated version by other websites, if Google is any indication. I know this can be unreliable, but the difference in results was very large, 3,800 results compared to 108,000. While I would use the hyphenated version if the committee used it themselves, I think that all of these reasons combined are enough to justify the renaming of the article. -- Kjkolb (talk) 03:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like I was mistaken about at least one thing. The National Human Rights Institutions Forum that I linked to above is not a parent organization for the committee. I am unsure what their relationship is, and they may just simply have documents written by the committee. -- Kjkolb (talk) 03:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kjkolb, you are right about the hyphen. Will edit to clarify status of NHRI Forum. 89.242.103.68 (talk) 14:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110315003139/http://www.scottishhumanrights.com/international/biennial to http://www.scottishhumanrights.com/international/biennial

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link in section heading

The subject heading for "The Sub-Committee on Accreditation" is a link to the website for the subcommittee. Should this link be moved to the External Links section? Skipidibodadob7 (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a lobbying group

The article doesn't make clear that GANHRI can on occasion be used as a lobbying factor within first-world member states? See - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/01/06/baroness-falkner-un-echr-blacklist-special-review/ We could do with a section on this.2001:8A0:7FC3:E200:6D1D:3FE6:9E20:C3D3 (talk) 06:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]