Jump to content

Talk:Gliese 581c/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Davidbuddy9 Talk  04:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this revision (click)

Review

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    Pass
    The lead paragraph is a nice read and it definitely seems to be polished.
    The sub-section Mass (under Physical characteristics) says clarification needed. But I don't see how this could be clarified more the sentence makes sense and is understandable already. So remove the clarification needed tag.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
    Under Liquid Water, add that citation from MOST used in the second last paragraph in Radius That justifies no transits.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    Recent edits have been mostly constructive so far of all edits made in 2016 to this article only 1 edit has been flagged as vandalism or testing but the edit itself didn't seem like vandalism altough the space between 581 and c should be there.:
  6. It is illustrated by two images, all of which are WP:AIAO compliant.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.