Talk:Glennda and Camille Do Downtown

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that according to academic Camille Paglia, her 1993 film Glennda and Camille Do Downtown was banned from multiple LGBT film festivals "for reasons of political incorrectness"?

Source: Vamps & Tramps: New Essays

ALT0a: ... that the 1993 documentary short film Glennda and Camille Do Downtown was reportedly banned from multiple LGBT film festivals "for reasons of political incorrectness"? Source: Vamps & Tramps: New Essays
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Motherland Calls

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 165 past nominations.

Morgan695 (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

The original hook is good to go. I'm not too keen on ALT1, since "reportedly" can be seen in some contexts as a weasel word (and we know who said the quote, anyway). Epicgenius (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]