Jump to content

Talk:Gleek (Super Friends)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not original research

[edit]

I don't know how "original research" really applies to Gleek's understanding of spoken English and strategic planning. He clearly does understand it. He has been shown able to lie (as when he vigorously shook his head when another of his kind -- a variation who spoke English -- identified him correctly as "the one they call Gleek," whereupon the accuser correctly called Gleek a liar), he has been shown to obey verbal commands, and even useful in planning (as when Wonder Woman told Gleek to distract Medusa and avoid looking into her eyes, both of which he accomplished successfully).

So, why does is stating that Gleek understands spoken English and can understand simple planning strategy "original research"? He has shown that he does!

It's about as much "original research" as saying that I can speak English and am literate. I'm writing this comment in English, therefore I am literate and can speak English, unless you really want to introduce the "million monkeys on a million typewriters" argument. PatrickLMT (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bucket power?

[edit]

It seems in every episode Gleek's superpower was known as "bucket power", as he was able to immediately produce a bucket out of thin air to contain the transformed Zan. Is that worth putting on the page? 12.41.204.3 (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gleek's bucket usage is referenced nuetrally on the page... Lots42 (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wondertwinsross.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Wondertwinsross.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Wondertwinsross.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]