Jump to content

Talk:Glee: The Music, The Power of Madonna/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article, and I will finish it very soon--Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Review Comments

All links looks good except number 38 is dead.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. If anyone disagrees, they can undo it, but I don't think it's a particularly important date, and there is no charting. Yves (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actual Review

Lol, before I say anything you did an awesome job, I know you really want thorough jobs when it comes to reviews Legolas but your articles are too good, so I couldn't find much, all i found was:

Lead

  • series Glee. --> series, Glee
Why? I don't think that's correct grammar. Yves (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a "the". Maybe that makes more sense. It is not, "the cast of the musical television series Glee". "Glee" is a [proper] noun and "television series" just describes what Glee is, and "musical" is an adjective. Yves (talk) 01:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol your right sorry the way I read it was wrong--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It contained seven cover versions of Madonna's songs. --> redundant it was stated previously
Done. Yves (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

  • In Belgium Walloon region --> Wallonia and remove region
Done. Should I link it? Not everyone may know what Wallonia is, considering it's not a country. Yves (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely =D --Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BTW I didn't want Belgium to be removed I just wanted the spelling to be changed =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. How should it be worded then? Saying "Belgium Wallonia" would be like saying "Canada Manitoba" or "United States Arkansas", which doesn't really make sense. And should it be linked to the Wallonia, the geographical area, or Walloon Region (federal region), the federal region? ["Walloon" is the demonym for Wallonia.] Yves (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Wa[reply]
Lol sorry I had no idea, just say "In the Wallonia region" and link the geographical area--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about "In Belgium's Wallonia region"? Yves (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Yves (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Netherlands --> the Netherlands
Done. Yves (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just these little things =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Passing this article...Great Work!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Blackjacks for reviewing it and thank you Yves for the prompt action on it. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]