Talk:GitKraken

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Out-of-date Article

The name of this software tool seems to have changed, and upon further review, the article seems to be significantly out of date .66.193.200.74 (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the page, reflecting recent changes to the software in question including its name change. Now it needs a move back to the original Axosoft article. 66.193.200.74 (talk) 22:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2022 updates

This article is out of date again (as of 2022). First the company was called Axosoft with a product called OnTime, then the product name changed to Axosoft, they added a product called GitKraken, and finally they changed the company name to GitKraken. I guess I would propose changing the name of the article to the company name, GitKraken, and briefly describing their two products. Palehose5 (talk) 19:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I updated this page to be mainly about the company GitKraken (the link to GitKraken redirects here anyway). I hope this change isn't too radical. I then updated the infobox. I removed the old list of accolades that made the page look like a big ad. I also added the fact that the company now has a parent company - bought in 2020. Palehose5 (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The next logical move would be to actually move this article to GitKraken, and have Axosoft redirect to GitKraken#Axosoft.Palehose5 (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also restored some old text about GitKraken from a previous version of this article, and re-added the infobox for Axosoft the product.Palehose5 (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Axosoft → GitKraken – The company's name has changed to GitKraken. Axosoft is now simply the name of one product, which is now much less notable that 10 years ago. Furthermore, GitKraken has no page of its own, so it makes sense to migrate this over to GitKraken (the company) and include sections about Axosoft and GitKraken (the product). Palehose5 (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per me Palehose5 (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By proposing the move request in the first place, you are already assumed to support it. Striking to make this clear. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, understood. Thanks.Palehose5 (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At this point this appears to be less controversial and/or less interesting than I'd thought. So I guess I'm OK to move this? I have been reading the documentation and I don't really understand the next step. I may have erred in my approach and instead used a "technical" move request process, since GitKraken already exists and redirects here. @Mellohi! Should I instead close this and relist as a technical move request? Palehose5 (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.