Talk:Girton College, Cambridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hchc2009 (talk • contribs • count) 06:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having read through the article, there is still a bit of work that needs to be done on references and citations. Although in general most statements are referenced, there are still a number of outstanding "citation needed" tags in the text which clearly need fixing before the article is ready for GA status. There are also a couple of outstanding "clarification needed" tags with suggest outstanding areas of improvement in the prose. If 85.126.74.171, the nominator, would like any advice on this, drop me a line here or on my talk page. I'm putting the article on hold for seven days to give them a bit of time to fix these before I carry on with the more detailed review. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As per the discussion on my talk page, I'll crack on with the next stage of this review either Thursday or Friday night. Many thanks for the work so far, Hchc2009 (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;

Detailed comments:

"1869 to 1976: Pioneering for women's education" - generally in this section you need to explain a little bit more - I've gone through the points below, but imagine that the reader's never been to Cambridge, doesn't know how the university and the college work, or what a Tripos exam is: how would you explain the early development of Girton to them?
"The wish to improve women's education developed from the early feminist movement in the 1860s..." "The wish"? I'm not convinced this is right, as various individuals before the 1860s had the same idea. "A wish"? "The early feminist movement in the 1860s began to argue for improvements to women's education..."?
"In 1862, they met..." Is this the same as the previous reference to a meeting, or a different occasion?
"A committee was set up to that effect..." - who set up the committee?
"Henry Tomkinson" - you'll need to explain who he was (e.g. "the University administrator Henry Tomkinson", or whatever)
"ninety-one girls" - should be "91 girls". Just to check - is "girl" right here? (I wanted to check that we didn't mean women)
"This first concession to women's educational rights met relatively little resistance, as admission to the examination did not imply residence of women at the university site." - what did the examination imply? It wasn't clear from the text what the examination was for.
"In 1869, Henry Sidgwick helped institute the Examinations for Women, designed to be more challenging than the Poll examinations, which were special examinations for candidates taking an Ordinary instead of an Honours degree,[6] but easier than the Tripos examinations" - I think you'll probably need to explain in this section a little bit about how the university system worked at the time; the Tripos system etc are linked, but its essential for the reader to know what they are to make sense of this sentence.
"The college was established..." - This is the first mention of Girton in the main article, so I'd say "Girton College", rather than use "the"
"under the name of College for Women at Benslow House, Hitchin, a convenient distance from Cambridge and London" - there's a word or two missing between House and Hitchin.
"It was thought to be less 'risky' and controversial to locate the college away from Cambridge in the beginning" - "risky" is a quote, and needs to be ascribed to someone. You probably also want to say "less controversial", to make it clear that the less applies to both bits.
"The Pioneers" - probably worth putting it in quotes. Who called them this?
"In 1871, with £7000 raised, land for building was to be bought either at Hitchin or near Cambridge" - "£7,000" would be consistent with the later style. Raised from whom? The phrasing is odd here, as you haven't mentioned the fundraising previously.
" By 1872, sixteen acres of land from the present site were purchased near the village of Girton" - "at the present site", not "from the present site" (which would need time travel!) :)
I'd advise giving modern equivalents for the financial sums (I can help with this if you need me to)
and consisted of a single block which comprised the east half of Old Wing." - "comprised" is wrong, as it didn't comprise it at the time. I'd suggest "which would eventually comprise the east half of the Old Wing", or something like that.
"At the time, thirteen students were admitted" - did this include the existing students from the old college?
"Taylor's Knob, the college laboratory and half of Hospital Wing built" - unclear from the wording what Taylor's Knob was.
" Old Kitchens added" - "the Old Kitchens"?
"Tower, Chapel and Woodlands Wing" - is this a single wing, or three?
You've three short paragraphs all beginning "In..." - I'd consider combining them into a single paragraph.
"By summer 1923 the committee completed the task..." either "the committee had completed the task", or "The committee completed the task by summer 1923."
"On 27 April 1948, women were admitted to full membership of the University of Cambridge." This needs expanding - how did it happen?

"The initial and defining parts" - are these different or the same thing? Also this sentence ends with a semi-colon, not a full stop.
"in 1886/1887" - unclear if this means between 1886 and 1887, or if the date is uncertain.
"It was considered to be luxurious and comfortable..." - considered by who? (e.g. students, contemporaries, etc.)
"Books were gathered mostly through donations." - "acquired mostly through donations"?
"son of Paul Waterhouse and grandson of Alfred Waterhouse and Giles Gilbert Scott" - I know they're linked, but it would be helpful to explain in the text why it significant who his father and grandfathers were.
"the new library consists" - "consisted"
"IT facilities" - IT needs linking or expanding.
"was openend" - spelling
"the interior is held very simply" - this didn't read quite right to me, especially the "held"
"In 1952, the year of the jubilee of the inauguration" - worth linking jubilee for less Anglic readers, or just saying "50th anniversary"
"The centre light depicts Our Lord in Majesty..." I'm not convinced you need this entire quote to describe one window, but be happy to discuss.
"where it reads that " services" - extra space before services
"who is being assisted by student chapel wardens." - "who is assisted by student chapel wardens"

(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;

For the books, where there's no ISBN number available, the norm would be to use an OCLC reference rather than an Amazon reference. Have a look here. There's also a template, OCLC xxx which will provide a link.
Where a book lacks a publisher (e.g. Lindsay's), you'll need to add "n.p.", or a similar tag, so that its clear that there isn't a publisher, rather than that you just haven't added it! Same with location.
The formatting of the "Web primary sources" is unusual for Wikipedia, and to be honest I found it hard to work through, but it meets the requirements of the guide to layout. I'd encourage you to consider one of the more common citations styles on the wiki for web pages, but it meets the GA criteria, with a few minor tweaks required:
"English heritage" - check capitalisation
"Girton college" - similarly
"Girton College librarian, Frances Gandy" - unclear why this isn't "Gandy, Frances, Girton College Library", which would be consistent with the rest of the list.
"Kids unlimited" - their website prefers "kidsunlimited"
"Girton college (1955). "Notes on the chapel window". Girton Review (Cambridge: Girton college) (Michaelmas term)." Doesn't seem to be a Web page or a primary source.
"AELD/JOC/EFR" - could you expand?
"Forestry Commission GB" - Normally the Forestry Commission doesn't abbreviate the GB.
"Conference Cambridge (2011). "Wolfson court". Retrieved 30 June 2011." - why isn't this with the other primary sources?
Check the capitalisation of the titles of the books and articles - the Wiki guidelines require capitalisation of the longer words.

(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;

Generally fine; a couple of bits are lacking citations:

The paragraph "Girton was not officially a college yet..." needs a source of some sort, particularly to support the quotation.
"On the Tompkins Table..." - needs a reference.
"The Mediterranean collection offers..." - needs a reference, particularly to support the "remarkable" bit
"These houses are available for second and third year undergraduates." - lacks a reference
"The proper dress of the gown and cap..." onwards lacks any citation
"It is used on the most formal occasions..." and the next two quotations lack citations

(c) it contains no original research.

None found yet. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

Neutral. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Stable. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images:

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

Most are fine. The Girton Pioneers.jpg could probably do with a date of death for the author, Verlag A.E. Tuthill. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Check the capitalisation on the captions (e.g. "Huntingdon road", and "Wolfson court main entrance"). Hchc2009 (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a few weeks and nothing's been touched, so I'm closing the review. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:27, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]