Jump to content

Talk:Girlfight/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The film was well received by critics - hyphen?
I'm always unsure whether hyphens are appropriate in places like these, but I've added one now.
Diana later goes to Hector's birthday party, but leaves when she sees Adrian acting close with his ex-girlfriend. -"acting close"? odd expression...you mean like "canoodling" or "getting (overly) friendly" or something...there must be a better expression.....
Changed to "getting friendly".
Is there anything about it paving the way for other films like it? Also, any sources mention that it was a springboard for Kusama and Rodriguez to go onto successful careers? Be nice to mention somewhere...
I added a "Legacy" section to the article. I addressed all of these points but unfortunately it's a bit brief since I wasn't able to find too much to discuss from the sources.
Perfect - exactly what I was thinking - something that gives its place in film lore/history. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality: - two queries above...
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: a couple of queries but nice article and nearly there....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC) nice Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Casliber: Thanks for the review, Cas, and sorry it took me a few days to address the comments you made (my replies are above). Tomorrow I'm going away for a week so if you have any more suggestions I'd appreciate if you can keep the review on hold until then. Thanks! 97198 (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]