Talk:Ginninderra electorate

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Canberra / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ginninderra electorate is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ginninderra electorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ginninderra electorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320094936/http://www.elections.act.gov.au/news/view/143/title/casual-vacancy-count-back-result-mr to http://www.elections.act.gov.au/news/view/143/title/casual-vacancy-count-back-result-mr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Election Results - STV

Hello fellow Wikipedians and election enthusiasts,

Because of the lack of election results on the pages for the ACT electorates, and the STV nature of the election I have taken it upon myself to add the election results in an STV format, specifically Template:STV Election box begin2 as used for the Irish elections, for example: the seat of Louth. This representation of an STV vote count allows for the reader to understand how preferences are distributed and how, for example, the Greens got 2 seats in Kurrajong despite getting less primary votes than the Liberals.

Once I have done this for the 2020 election if I can find the results I will do it for previous elections, creating new pages for that purpose.

If anyone has problems with this please raise them here and hopefully we can come to a consensus.

I have copied this message to the other electorate talk pages.

Thanks - Not Another NPC 06:04, 19 October 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Not Another NPC (talk • contribs)

Discussion proceeding here Not Another NPC (talk) 11:21, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]