Talk:Ginger Snaps (film)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, all old good articles are being re-reviewed to ensure that they meet current good article criteria (as detailed at WP:WIAGA. Overall the article is very good, but I have determined that this article needs some upkeep to maintain its status, and have some additional comments:

The plot summarily is rightly marked as overly long. There are so many details it's rather convoluted.
Some unsourced statements/original research:
- "Interestingly, both actresses were born in the same hospital, attended the same pre-school, elementary and private schools, and are at the same agency. Perkins was twenty-two at the time and Isabelle four years younger, but it was Perkins who would be cast as the younger sister."
- " However, they did credit it as a worthy attempt and often gave it half marks on their star scales."
- "Owing to a cult following, it has managed to post significant video and DVD sales. These earnings combined with moderate theatrical success abroad have translated into the creation of a trilogy."
- "As of 2008, no further information has developed, and it remains to be seen if a TV series will materalize."
There are lots of one or two sentence groupings that are not paragraphs by themselves (by definition they need three or more.) These need to be merged, fleshed out or cut.
File:Katharine Isabelle1.jpg- I don't see much of a rationale for the use of the non-free image, as there isn't much that requires her portrait in the film or couldn't be adequately replaced with a free image of the actress.

I am putting the article on hold for one week pending resolution of these concerns. Please keep me appraised on this page of progress. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As there has been no progress on any of the above issues, I am delisting. The article can be renominated at any time, but I encourage editors to fix the listed issues. Further comments or questions should be directed to my talk page. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.