Talk:Ginema
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Ball & Shpeley vs. Ball.
[edit]I removing the verification needed tags. It's not unusual for a taxonomic paper with multiple authors to have some taxa specifically credited to only one of the authors. Presumably Ball recognized it as a new genus and species independently, and then worked with a colleague to confirm that it represented a new subfamily. Plantdrew (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)