Talk:Gigantophis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gigantophis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Gigantophis is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflicting range

Article may need clearing, if fossils have been found in Colombia then range extends beyond current day sahara. Vercynogetorix (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, the fossils from Colombia belongs to Titanoboa, not Gigantophis, as is already stated in the text. However, the article certainly needs more information... --Rextron (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vercynogetorix: Gigantophis and Titanoboa are not the same genus, so there is no conflict.--Kev min § 03:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

N.b. concerning redescription

Please do not add images from Rio and Mannion (2017)'s redescription of Gigantophis. While the images are CC, they are non-commerical, which means we cannot use them. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]