Talk:Gift registry
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gift registry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
MyRegistry.com references
[edit]The entire Universal Gift Registries section sounds like an advertisement for MyRegistry.com. Please use more objective language to describe the features of the service. As an individual performing research on this topic, if I wanted something of this quality, I would have stayed on MyRegistry.com's "About Us" page instead of coming to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.166.43 (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes, there's no need for this section. MyRegistry can just be added to the list of these services in the Examples section. I'll go ahead and delete it. Malikov (talk) 17:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Neutrality of article
[edit]Have removed a long list of references of various stores that provide Gift Lists to neutralise article, and added reference to Gift Registries in the UK. micromatt4 (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2013 (GMT)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gift registry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518205508/http://www.icsc.org/srch/sct/sct0504/page232.php to http://www.icsc.org/srch/sct/sct0504/page232.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)