Talk:Gibson F-5

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles

Musical Instruments Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

I assessed this as a mid-importance article for the Wikiproject Musical Instruments, this instrument having become one of the more desired and expensive stringed instruments in the United States, and one which has become widely imitated. I rated it a stub because it is the bare-beginning of an article. The references are good so far. If you improve it and want reassessment or need help or have questions, please drop me a line.Jacqke (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean:

"Some of them are referred to as Fern for the inlay of their headstock"? Is there a fern pattern inlaid? If that's what it means, a photo would help. LadyofShalott 22:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are no images we are allowed to use from Flickr, but if you search there, you'll see a couple of photos. Yes, it's a fernish pattern, I guess. The photo in Vintage Guitar is fantastic--did your copy not come in yet? I've edited the sentence that offended you so much--I think you left out the "WTF" in "What does this mean." Ha! Drmies (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hah! That's your phrasing, not mine. :) I do think your newer version is clearer, thanks. (I'm surprised there are no images with an appropriate license - that's too bad!) LadyofShalott 01:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]