Talk:Giblin family

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance

	Australia portal Giblin family is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Although the notability of a few of the individuals extensively listed in this article is clear in that they have their own articles (or their spouses do), the vast majority, say 90%, are clearly not notable at all. This entire article is against NOTGENEALOGY, frankly, and seems like a vanity edit. The "founder" of the family in Van Diemen's Land isn't himself notable, which would lend some validity to the concept of a dynasty descending FROM him being more inherently notable than would a family such as this clearly is, descending from a not-at-all-notable man. This is just a commonly-encountered case of a family settling in a place, proliferating, and a few of them being of some note in the region. The family itself isn't inherently notable at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.196.238 (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]