Talk:Giantess

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spam Links

The various spam links (with "adult content", including pornography) that were posted in this article are clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy and have been removed. Following is a list of what was posted. Please do not add them back in. --T-dot 23:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing a wiki in a way that is intentionally disruptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of legitimate information, insertion of nonsense or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki. - see Wiki vandalism for more information

Types of vandalism ... These are the most common forms of vandalism on Wikipedia:

Spam - Adding inappropriate external links for advertisement and/or self-promotion. - see Wikipedia:Vandalism for more information

(5 "adult content" spam external links deleted, not needed)

Context

I've attempted to do a little cleanup and provide context for some of the popular culture examples. I added references to how the giantess theme was used (whether as metaphor, eroticism, or for humor). I think this makes them a little more significant to the article (rather than just being a list of giantess appearances). Rajah1 02:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

”Giantess Magazine” – Spurious?

I suppose I risk being beaten to a paste by an enormous troll, but does the ”Giantess Magazine” shown at the end of the article really exist? There is no citation, the image was made by the uploader, I’m getting zero hits on Google, the charming user page seems to depict a fictional character, etc.

I’m guessing this is not a print magazine, and not even an e-magazine, just a mock-up cover. If there are any real magazines about giantesses, the page should show one of them. If there aren’t, the use of this image is pure disinformation. 83.251.135.29 (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should giantesses in fiction be a seperate ategory from giants in fiction?

I think this is one of those categories like witch that is gender specific. CensoredScribe (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Term Usage

Outside of erotica and fetish context, has the term "giantess" ever found common usage? In all examples of giant women throughout cultural works in history, do any of them use "giantess" rather than simply "giant"? I'd imagine that the article of Giantess should very clearly make the distinction that this term (unless I'm wrong) is largely a result of modern erotica and that instances of giant women before this time were not referred to as such.108.54.168.177 (talk) 16:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norse mythology

Remark I came to this page from the page about Baldr, a Norsh god. And apparently there is nothing mythological. Maybe some improvements can be done. improvements: redirecting between Jotuns and Giants in English, adding of content on this page. User:Appleuseryu — Preceding undated comment added 14:49, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quite. I've restored some of the mythological entries; the fetish cruft remains to be winnowed down. Yamara ✉ 22:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

macrophilia

Not sure where to put it exactly, but we should probably link from here to there. This article does touch on the erotic aspect of giantesses in film. Equinox ◑ 23:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dreagan tales

I wish that I could see more Giants 184.101.112.225 (talk) 22:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]