Talk:Giant danio

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aquarium Fishes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Aquarium Fish articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Aquarium FishesWikipedia:WikiProject Aquarium FishesTemplate:WikiProject Aquarium FishesAquarium Fishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

In captivity the Giant Danio will usually accept most foods. It is a peaceful fish that gets along well with other fish in community tanks. It is often used to "start" aquariums, although it is not as popular as the smaller, and very hardy, Zebra danio.

This information conflicts with my personal experience, where they were relatively aggressive, but hardier than the zebras. Mine may have been an abberant case (hence leaving the information intact), but I'd be more comfortable with a more explicit citation for these items. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spyforthemoon (talk • contribs) 2006-10-24T15:44:39 (UTC)

Citations

When an entire paragraph is derived from the same source(s), is it really necessary to cite each individual sentence? Wouldn't it make more sense—and look less cluttered—to simply list the citations at the end of the paragraph? Nonstopdrivel (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]