Talk:Gian Merlino
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 April 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted. It describes the contributions of a notable technologist, co-creator of hte widely-used open source package Apache Druid (used by over 1,000 organizations, inlcuding the Wikimedia Foundation: https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2018/01/02/wikistats-2/ ). I believe this should qualify as notable under CSD A7.
- Notability is a separate issue from WP:A7, which is "some indication of importance ". A much lower threshold. To be notable, a subject needs significant coverage of content cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Tags added on 10 Feb
[edit]On February 10, Ciridae added {{Notability}}
, {{Self-published}}
, {{Third-party}}
, and {{Unreliable sources}}
tags to this page.
Notability was earlier discussed on this talk page. While Gian Merlino is not in the same notability category as Albert Einstein, he is the co-creator of the open source package Apache Druid, used by over 1,000 organizations, including the Wikimedia Foundation: https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2018/01/02/wikistats-2/
The reference to LinkedIn should be replaced with something else to cite his education status. This seems to be the course of thle self-published, third-party, and unreliable sources tags.
Does anyone see other issues that should be addressed to remove those tags? Briskmad (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- The LinkedIn reference has been replaced. Any objections to removing the other template tags?Briskmad (talk) 02:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Having seen no response here for 3 days, I am going to remove the tags. If someone believes they are still justified, please join the conversation!Briskmad (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies, I did not see the talk page message and did not respond earlier. No, I don't think that the issues highlighted by the templates have been adequately addressed. Notability requires coverage in reliable, third-party secondary sources, independent of the subject. Most of the sources do not qualify. And surviving speedy deletion is not a notability discussion, I'm afraid; that's a much lower threshold. I have reverted your change for now, but if you still think otherwise, you or another editor can remove the templates again, but please make a note of the reason why in the edit summary. Ciridae (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- This article is a biography of the co-creator of Apache Druid, a technology widely-used by thousands of organizations. This seems to qualify for notability under WP:AUTHOR: "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique"
- Apologies, I did not see the talk page message and did not respond earlier. No, I don't think that the issues highlighted by the templates have been adequately addressed. Notability requires coverage in reliable, third-party secondary sources, independent of the subject. Most of the sources do not qualify. And surviving speedy deletion is not a notability discussion, I'm afraid; that's a much lower threshold. I have reverted your change for now, but if you still think otherwise, you or another editor can remove the templates again, but please make a note of the reason why in the edit summary. Ciridae (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are multiple sources cited for this article. alumnius.net, apache.org, and datascienceassn.org are reliable sources that are independent of the subject. While they are not secondary sources, they seem to fall under the guidelines for inclusion in WP:PRIMARY. I've added an additional paragraph, with a citiation of an independent reporting source, SF Scala. Ciridae what else do you think is needed to remove the templates? Or do you believe that this person is not sufficiently notable to deserve inclusion in Wikipedia, so no remediation is possible? Briskmad (talk) 04:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- NA-Class biography articles
- NA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- NA-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Science and academia work group articles needing attention
- Biography articles needing attention
- NA-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- NA-Class Computing articles
- NA-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Software articles needing attention
- All Software articles