Jump to content

Talk:Giambattista della Porta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not Vandals

[edit]

We are not vandals. We are editing this page for a school project. Some of the odd things that was on this site were merely placeholders that we never meant to leave there. We are NOT VANDALS. And we intend to get rid of the placeholders and fill them in with serious responses within the hour. That is, we would if you would let us. Thank you.

-HardingBenson

This note should have been signed by the editor with 4 ~ in a row, which would have automatically included the data and time of the edit, and the name or IP address of the editor. As it stands, the note is addressed to someone, who should have been identified. ww 07:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed

[edit]

Charles J. Mendelsohn commented:

He was, in my opinion, the outstanding cryptographer of the Renaissance. Some unknown who worked in a hidden room behind closed doors may possibly have surpassed him in general grasp of the subject, but among those whose work can be studied he towers like a giant.

Could some one provide a citation for this quote ? its been deleted twice. I'll repost if its cited J8079s (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cipher

[edit]

Porta's Cipher is definitely one of my favorite coding techniques. the fact that it requires that MASSIVE 26x26 matrix is a bit of a bummer though. Porta was really the best cryptographer of the renaissance.n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.88.30 (talk) 04:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giambattista della Porta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giambattista della Porta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for even being here ?

[edit]

whoever made this page , I thank you , this is helping me better understand who I am and who I decend from . But I know why I am here why is everyone else here ? 2600:8805:C40B:1C00:B04E:6CEF:CBDA:84CE (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here following up on an interesting tangential mention of Della Porta in Carlo Ginzburg's The Night Battles. It sounds like your ancestor was a semi famous polymath who made early contributions to a lot of important intellectual fields and rubbed shoulders with influential people. It seems entirely unsurprising that he should have a Wikipedia page. Mr.Edross (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Religious Complications Section Problems

[edit]

The section titled "Religious Complications" has some issues, and I'm hoping a future editor with knowledge on the subject can either fix it or eliminate it by folding in the relevant parts somewhere else. For starters it seems largely redundant with the second paragraph of the "Pioneering Scientific Society" section. Also it doesn't cite any references. Also the meaning of the last two sentences is unclear and seems dependent on external context:

"Porta's involvement with the Inquisition puzzles historians due to his active participation in charitable Jesuit works by 1585. A possible explanation for this lies in Porta's personal relations with Fra Paolo Sarpi after 1579."

"Porta's involvement" as far as I can tell from the lead-in was that he was targeted with suspicion by the Inquisition but this phrase seems to be implying greater agency than that. Then we're left to wonder specifically how his involvement in the inquisition is at odds with active participation in religious charitable pursuits and which experts are puzzled by the contradiction. Then whatever the contradiction is it is potentially explained by some unexplained "relations" with someone named Sarpi.

I hope someone qualified can bring this section up to the quality level of the rest of the article or otherwise address these issues. Mr.Edross (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]