Jump to content

Talk:Getxo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Getxo has just 3 districts: Algorta, Las Arenas and Santa Maria de Getxo.

It's actual name is Getxo, the form Guecho does not exist.

ANV did nor receive any vote in Getxo. There were 3247 invalid ballots that ANV claims to be of citizens who wanted to vote for them, but there are no evidences to support their claim. ANV candidatures in Getxo were invalidated by the Spanish Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court before before the elections.

Suggested changes:

Political party Votes % votes town councillors
EAJ-PNV 13 562 35,11 % 10 *
PP 12 792 33,12 % 10 *
PSE-EE 6 118 15,84 % 4
IU/Aralar 2 487 6,44 % 1
Eusko Alkartasuna 1 538 4,07% 0
Berdeak (Greens) 1 293 3,35% 0
Invalid ballots (claimed by ANV) 3 247 *ANV claims 2 councillors of the town

File:Puente Colgante.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Puente Colgante.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Puente Colgante.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Getxo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]