Jump to content

Talk:Gettysburg (The Office)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGettysburg (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starGettysburg (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 7, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gettysburg (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues and suggestions
# Where? Issue Per
1 Infobox Where are guest stars referenced? WP:SOURCE, WP:WIAGA
2 Infobox Add The Office US season 8 link to episode lists, something
3 Lede Link comedy to television comedy instead WP:OVERLINK
4 Lede Same goes for television series, as issue 3 WP:OVERLINK
5 Lede NBC should be the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) for its first mention MOS:ACRO
6 Lede In the episode, to "In this episode"
7 Lede Nielsen Media Research should be Nielsen ratings
8 Production "The A.V. Club reviewer Myles McNutt applauded the writers' use of Andy's "overeager qualities" to have the office group skip the official tour, allowing "some random California heritage site" to stand in for the real Gettysburg" that seems to be about episode themes, not production
9 Production "The Official website for The Office" The Office should be in italics please WP:MOS
10 Production % should be percent please Copy-edits
11 Reception What channel did it air on? Not mentioned here at all. WP:LEDE, etc.
12 Reception ABC should be American Broadcasting Company (ABC) in its first mention here MOS:ACRO
13 Reception Use regular quotation marks, rather than curly, as seen in "didn’t" in reception WP:MOS
14 Reception "mostly" to "generally"
15 Reception "cold opening" remove cold WP:NPOV
16 References Don't shout at me lol Sourcing
17 References Use single quotes in reference titles, rather than double WP:MOS
18 References WP:DASH problems WP:DASH
19 External links Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order please Guidelines
Sorry for the wait. I suddenly went on a Wikibreak. Oh well, that's all. Cheers, TBrandley 01:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries about the break! I got all of the issues fixed. The only one I didn't was #1: the guest stars are referenced to the episode, and since this is an article about the episode, it seems rather redundant to cite the episode for the article about the episode. Thanks for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looks good now; passing. Well done! TBrandley 01:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gettysburg (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gettysburg (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]