Talk:Get It Right (Glee cast song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FeuDeJoie 22:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Well written. No obvious problems, a few minor issues.
Prose
[edit]Article is generally well written;
Introduction
- The sentence "who produced the song, with his wife, Nikki Hassman," is there need for repetitive commas - "who produced the song with his wife Nikki Hassman". Edit punctuation Microsoft Word grammar check flagged this as incorrect also.
Background
- Same problem as above with the second sentence in the section.
- The remainder of the section is very well written and punctuation is excellent.
Composition
- Well written, no obvious problems.
Critical reception
- Voerding, Who is this? You have previously discussed him in the composition section but for a first time reader it seems as if he is a random person as no publisher is listed in this section only in the composition section. It is confusing. Add more detail.
- Other than listed above the section is easy to read, factual and understandable.
Chart performance
- Chart positions need its own section change positions to a separate section: Charts.
- Well written, factual and clear.
Factually accurate?
[edit]- No problems; no outstanding references needed, no original research and all notable.
Coverage
[edit]- Factual, doesn't waffle and everything is relevant.
Neutral
[edit]- Not biased, Critical reception show a good mix of responses.
Stable
[edit]- No edit wars. Stable.
References
[edit]Critical reception
- Reference 5 Seattle Post-Intelligencer, it is repeated twice in one continuous sentence. Why?
Overall
[edit]Generally well-written aside from what I have stated. I am placing this article on hold for seven days in which the nominator can message me with any queries and can fix the problems listed or otherwise contest and debate them with me for a final conclusion. FeuDeJoie
- Despite being a great article the few problems listed have not been addressed and so due to this I am failing it as a GA nomination because no effort has been made to even respond to the review or any personal messages. If you would wish to re-nominate the article I will gladly reinstate my review which you then would hopefully respond to, Thanks --FeuDeJoie (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)