Jump to content

Talk:Get Carter/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • The "short description" goes above everything (MOS:ORDER).
  • Add alt text for the film poster (WP:ALTTEXT).
  • Use plainlists instead of <br /> (template rules).
  • Is the reference after Ian Hendry necessary?
  • Same question for the one at the end of the 1st paragraph.
  • See MOS:'S for when to use 's instead of s'.
  • "home town" → "hometown"
  • Shouldn't "north-east England" be written as North East England?
  • There are now 2 short descriptions.

Plot and cast

[edit]
  • Plot is exactly 700 words so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • Add a comma after "At the funeral".
  • "under water" → "underwater"
  • "for audition" → "for auditions"

Production

[edit]
  • "which explored this freedom" → "that explored this freedom"
  • "MGM agreed a reasonable" → "MGM agreed to a reasonable"
  • Is there a word missing between "agreeing the deal"?
  • Is the comma after "early 2008" necessary?
  • Can we change all uses of "..." to "[...]" for consistency?
  • Again, should "north east" be capitalized?
  • "by the producer" → "from the producer"
  • #Post-production feels kinda small. Can it be merged with another section?
  • Other than that, everything else looks good.

Releases

[edit]
  • This section is normally titled "Release".
  • "tag-line" → "tagline"
  • "pump action shotgun" → "pump-action shotgun"
  • Add a comma after "in the finished film".
  • "Warner Brothers, copyrighted 2001" sounds weird. Reword?

Reception

[edit]
  • Try paraphrasing per WP:RECEPTION.
  • That's about everything in this section.

Remakes and legacy

[edit]
  • "which are directly borrowed" → "that are directly borrowed"
  • The last sentence in the first paragraph in #Legacy needs a source.

References

[edit]

This section needs the most work.

  • Sources from Blogspot and Discogs (#9, #10, #63) are not reliable.
  • YouTube uploads of certain scenes (#71, #72) are also not reliable.
  • WP:IMDB is prohibited from being used as a source (#73, #85, #123).
  • A check should be done to make sure each citation has an author/date/website listed.
  • Is the last source in #External_links (Clothes on Film) necessary?
  • Make sure to sort categories alphabetically.
  • Finally, archive sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes

[edit]
@PatTheMoron: Hope you're doing well. Everything looks better now. However, the last sentence in #Legacy still needs a source. After adding one or replying, ping me and I'll pass the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, @Some Dude From North Carolina:! PatTheMoron (talk) 06:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]