Talk:Gershwin Theatre/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 13:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is appropriately licensed.

What makes apops.mas.org a reliable source? The cited page says "Profile submitted by..." which makes me wonder if there's an editorial process.
Re the "Special Theater District amendment of 1967"; is there a link? If not, would a red link be justified?
"There were no new legitimate shows in 1974": what's a "legitimate" show?
"Livent's revival of Voltaire's Candide opened that April": shouldn't it be "Bernstein's Candide"?

That's everything; looks in very good shape as usual. By the way, looking through the GAN page I see you have too old GANs under review that you haven't responded to in a month -- 229 West 43rd Street and Apple Bank Building. Since you've been responsive to my reviews I just wanted to check you hadn't forgotten about them. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie, thanks for the comments. I will address them shortly, but basically the apops.mas.org source is taken from a book published by the New York City Department of City Planning. There is no link for the 1967 legislation, and only a handful of theaters were built under that law before it was abolished. A legitimate show refers to a legitimate theatre production (as opposed to something like a concert or a movie). I'll fix the Candide thing soon.

Thanks for your concern about the other two GANs as well. I basically forgot the other two GANs, and I didn't even realize that it's been a month since the 229 West 43rd Street review. From time to time, I tend to focus a lot on some things and forget about others. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK on APOP and the legislation, and I see you've fixed the other two items. Passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.