Talk:German destroyer Z51/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Iazyges: I am confused with the article title. Is this article about a ship or a class. The first line of the lead speaks as if it is about a class, where as the later part says this is about a ship. Again, infobox is about class of ship. And the body is also confusing in that way. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- It is a class that only possessed one ship; so the name of the article is the name of the ship, as per WP norm (unless they are part of a class which was supposed to have dozens of ships, but only had one laid down, and the rest cancelled, or some other extreme.) I'll make that more clear. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox;
- Italics on "Kriegsmarine"
- Done
- 1943–?
- Done
- Link units and armaments in infobox
- Done
- Section 1;
- Italics on "Kriegsmarine"
- Done
- Link "two-stroke", "diesel engine"
- Done
- was modified heavily; from which? the original design? Did it have complications that would delay the construction?
- From the original design; if I recall correctly it was hinted that the engines would take too long to build, since almost all naval resources were focused on U-boats at this time. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- "the only ship of the class to be laid down"; this has already been mentioned in the para 1
- Fixed
- RM? It is never defined before, if it is the currency define it in braces on the first mention
- Fixed
- Her breaking up was finished
on"in" February 1949 - Done
- Section 2;
- Link "motor pinnace", "torpedo cutter", "anti-aircraft gun"
- Done
- Be consistent on using the conversion template; 108 metres, 12.7-centimetre; check usage of hyphen
- Done
- Also abbreviate the units from second mention
- Done
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: I believe I have done all you have asked.
- @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Do you have any more concerns? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: I believe I have done all you have asked.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: