Talk:German destroyer Z4 Richard Beitzen

German destroyer Z4 Richard Beitzen has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

German destroyer Z4 Richard Beitzen is part of the Type 1934 destroyers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 1, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
January 29, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted
February 24, 2018	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 25, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that of the four German destroyers of the Type 1934 class, only Z4 Richard Beitzen survived World War II, while Z1 Leberecht Maass and Z3 Max Schultz were sunk in a friendly fire incident and Z2 Georg Thiele was scuttled at Narvik?
Current status: Good article

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Scrapping

Sources vary on the year of the scrapping of the ship, with some saying 1947 and others 1949. The location isn't clear either. Calistemon (talk) 01:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:German destroyer Z4 Richard Beitzen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 16:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Hans Dominik (Kriegsmarine) commanded Z4 from January 1943 to January 1944 "Richard Beitzen, together with the rest of the 5th Destroyer Flotilla" in that paragraph, I assume "5th Destroyer Flotilla" is a German flotilla? Earlier in that section it was a British flotilla. It would help the reader if the affilitation is clearer worked out.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Currently misses notable commanders, Hans-Joachim Gadow later Konteradmiral, Hans Dominik KC recipient, Walter Lüdde-Neurath, later adjutant of Dönitz
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

None of my sources reference Dominik and I've added a link to the German unit, using its German name to distinguish it from its British counterpart.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. He is mentioned on page 74 of Hildebrand, Hans H.; Röhr, Albert; Steinmetz, Hans-Otto (1990). Die Deutschen Kriegsschiffe. Biographien - ein Spiegel der Marinegeschichte von 1815 bis zur Gegenwart. (10 Bände) (in German). Mundus Verlag. Volume 7, Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Dominick and von Gadow. Is Lüdde-Neurath really notable? Dönitz's adjutant isn't really notable in and of itself and he only had command of the ship when she was being rebuilt.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CE

Tidied prose, changed isbn-10 to 13s checked for dupe wikilinks auto ed, rv as desired. Keith-264 (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]