This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Hi, this looks pretty good. I have a couple of observations/suggestions as part of my B class review:
in the infobox it says "Ordered: 9 January 1935", but in the prose it says "ordered on 10 November 1934";
in the Design and description section, you might consider adding a sentence on the size of the complement, given that it is mentioned in the infobox;
the final paragraph doesn't seem to state whether or not the ship sunk, but the infobox states that the ship did;
"Groener" in the Notes "Gröner" in the References;
"Lieutenant Commander (Fregattenkapitän) Schulze-Hinrichs had decided" (this doesn't seem to indicate who Schulza-Hinrichs is or was - I assume he was the ship's captain? If so, it should probably be stated with a small clause, e.g. "Lieutenant Commander (Fregattenkapitän) Schulze-Hinrichs, the ship's captain, had decided").AustralianRupert (talk) 04:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
