Talk:German cruiser Leipzig

German cruiser Leipzig has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

German cruiser Leipzig is part of the Light cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
March 16, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:German cruiser Leipzig/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC) I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	addressed
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	OK
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	OK
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	OK
	2c. it contains no original research.	OK
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	good coverage
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	OK
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	OK
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	OK
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	OK
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	OK
	7. Overall assessment.	Points addressed

Comments

Two dablinks need fixing [1]
"and was scuttled in July 1946"
"and four of 7-cylinder"
"by six Mmarine-type"
needs a space between "12" and "x" in the infobox re: torpedo tubes
"since the end of World War I. ~~in 1934~~"
"the battleship Gneisenau, ~~and~~ cruiser Deutschland"
" the light cruiser Köln'"
the "Baltic Sea", "Köln" and "Skagerrak" links are duplicated
- All of the above should be taken care of. Parsecboy (talk) 14:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
no alt text on images (not required at GA)
suggest you convert to 13 digit isbn's (not required)
- In my experience at FAC, the source people there want to keep the original 10-digit isbns for books that were published before 2007. Don't ask me why.
other toolbox checks all green (no action required)

Great article as usual. Just a couple of points to be addressed then she's fine to be promoted. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for reviewing the article, Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 14:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - No worries. Promoted.