Talk:German cruiser Emden/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
This seems awkward: The shape of the ship followed cruiser designs from late in World War I and fix this: The she had an armored belt and it would probably be worthwhile to specify that it was the waterline armored belt. This should probably be split into two sentences: The ship had a standard crew of nineteen officers and 464 enlisted men, though while serving on cadet training cruises, her crew numbered twenty-nine officers and 445 enlisted, with 162 cadets. And this is awkward: These guns had 900 up to 1,200 rounds of ammunition in total.
See how they read now.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Be sure to add country or state for Gröner, Hildebrand, Rohwer, Showell, and Williamson. Replace the ASIN for Hildebrand with an OCLC or ISBN.
I've got to stop copying these from old articles...
Is DE for Delaware or Deutschland?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deutschland - should I link it to be clear? Parsecboy (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, just use Germany. I dislike links to places in citations and refs, but that's just me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Parsecboy (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
What's a transverse metacentric height? Transverse? What do you mean by two generator systems? Two groups of generators on separate circuits? 53.5 cm torpedoes? I wasn't aware that this was a caliber used by the Germans. Is this a typo for 53.3 cm? I can check Campbell for you if you don't have a copy on hand.
Linked to wikt:transverse. Groner says "two electricity plants", nothing about circuits or anything else. Yes, that's a typo.
I was really just questioning the use of transverse in conjunction with metacentric height as I've never seen that usage before. I don't suppose that it's incorrect, since all metacentric height is transverse by definition, but it just read oddly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough - I don't usually use it myself, I was probably looking a little too closely at Groner, who always uses it. Parsecboy (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Link to the Tbts KC/36, even if it's just a red link.
Added.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: