Talk:German aircraft carrier II/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Petebutt (talk · contribs) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC) I don't think this is working properly Petebutt (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
prose: (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

I see nothing wrong with the Article in question. Would it be acceptable if I formally do the GA business or would it be better if I wait for the original reviewer to respond? Thurgate (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

With only 10000 hp (7500 kW) there is no way the ship could reach 32 knots. If it was ten times more it would look reasonable. 18 March 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.237.96 (talk) 08:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]