Talk:German Faith Movement

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neopaganism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First section

"...his political sentiments were also commented on." No citation, and quite possibly no substance. Commented on by whom? What did they say?

Removed the last paragraph for use of weasel words and because it served no purpose other than propaganda. The sources it cited were simply website of certain pagan groups and not credible. Anyone disagree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jäger von Lügen (talk • contribs) 20:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't check the websites you mention. But as of date, this article is ambiguous and uses terms like "Indian (Hindu)" and "Bhagawad Gita" without any elaboration and particularly without inline citation. The references to Jung's impression of the movement seem to check out, but thus far the article is thoroughly unimpressive.

Are these two sentences contradictory?

User 96.42.99.39 changed the sentence "sought to move Germany away from Christianity towards a religion based on "immediate experience" of God" which had been there since the creation of the page to "sought to move Germany away from Christianity towards a religion based on National Socialism". How appropriate is it to let this change stand? Are both sentences true? If yes how do we combine both data? Contact Basemetal here 15:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nazis followed a movement called Positive Christianity. This was a Nazified version of Christianity that followed Nazi race theory and removed the "Jewish" elements from Christianity. Hitler first mentions Positive Christianity in point 24 of the the 1920 Nazi party Platform. stating: "the Party as such represents the viewpoint of Positive Christianity without binding itself to any particular denomination". 45.47.168.39 (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]