Talk:Gerber Legendary Blades
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]re: suggested merge. I have no problem with a merge, but I don't know how important the Gerber Guardian is; if it's en par with the Mark II, then I'd suggest we (I) need to find some more info to plagiarise write into the article..
The existing article for the guardian needs massively expanding if not merging. --194.80.176.253 17:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
This article needs expanding, sourcing, etc. I concur with the idea to merge the individual knife articles into this one. --Mike Searson 22:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- should the frame lock feature be mentioned as well? seems innovative, not sure if its new
The lead section seems to contradict the history section on the founding date. Huw Powell (talk) 00:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Fork
[edit]I have a fork that one point broke off is there any warranty on them . 2600:1700:EB30:1930:7C88:DBE3:DC6F:2A9B (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages