Talk:Gerber/Hart Library and Archives

This article was nominated for deletion on August 9, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Loves Pride

This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2016.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles

Proposed deletion

Koavf, your proposed deletion was so fast (less than 2 minutes), it could make one assume that you have an extensive knowledge of libraries in general and gay-specific libraries in particular. Since "non-notable" invariably implies a degree of judgment, can you elaborate on your reasons for proposing the deletion? -- RayBirks 17:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure This article is not encyclopedic. If we have this, we might as well have First library with a magazine, Largest library on an island, List of people with two or less ears, etc. Why should we have an article on a library with 14,000 books? It took less than two minutes to read because there is virtually no content, and I find it doubtful there ever will be. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 18:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The non-notable claim is invalid. Davodd 22:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Davodd, for those of us still learning, what criteri(on)(a) did you use to decide the non-notable indication was invalid? I considered removing the "prod" (proposed for deletion) marker on my own but had not yet gotten it together. Reading WP:Notability was only partially helpful. -- RayBirks 23:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay. The claim about the non-notable claim is invalid. See how we get nowhere when you're flippant? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 23:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Koavf, again for us learners: Did you mean to use only 3 colons for indenting? Your reply seems to be to Davodd and not to myself, which suggests a different indent. (If you make a correction, please correct this comment to follow you.) -- RayBirks 00:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Re: "Davodd" Yes, I was trying to respond to Davodd. That's why I don't like these semi-colons. Ugh. Feel free to re-format this edit however you see fit to make it intelligible and retain its meaning. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - I recommend reading User:Uncle G/On notability and User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage. Uncle G 18:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my terseness was offensive. On second reading, I would have been offended if it was in response to something I did. User:Uncle G is correct. - Davodd 01:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gerber/Hart Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerber/Hart Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017032241/http://www.glhalloffame.org/index.pl?page=inductees&todo=year to http://www.glhalloffame.org/index.pl?page=inductees&todo=year

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]