Talk:Gerard J. Foschini

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I couldn't find out his date of birth, or his parents' names. I'd also like to be able to quote some accurate figure for his number of publications, but the IEEEXplore author search only turns up about 370 — surely it's more than that? -Splash 21:02, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Apart from being a slightly absurdist statement, Foschini demonstrably meets the following points from Wikipedia:Notability (people):

The person has received significant recognized awards or honors.
The person has demonstrable wide name recognition
The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field.

and then from the 'creative professionals' section:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.

...all of which are referenced in the article already. If you want more references then add them; that you have not done so does not make the subject non-notable. Splash - tk 09:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone accused Foschini of being a "slightly absurdist statement", but the if you read the page about notability you'll see that what's required is that the evidence of notability be placed into the article, in the form of references to secondary sources about the subject. Find books are articles that talk about him getting those awards, etc. Patents granted, papers written and cited, things BY the subject, are not sufficient to establish notability. The only references in the article so far are by the subject, which is fine, but does not establish notability. Dicklyon 14:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The notion that Foschini is non-notable is a slightly absurdist statement.

Nobody has stated that. We're just calling for the required evidence to be cited in the article. Dicklyon 17:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect that there are no secondary sources. Please review the article more thoroughly. Inline citations are perfectly valid. If you're quibbling over an issue of formatting, then please re-format to your heart's content. Splash - tk 15:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, perhaps I missed some. I'll look again. Dicklyon 17:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I converted some embedded links to refs, and moved his numbered pubs to a pubs section. Some of those might be the refs needed for something else I tagged. You seem to be experienced enough at wikipedia editing to do this right instead of leaving it as a mess for others to clean up. Dicklyon 17:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerard J. Foschini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]