Talk:Georgina Kenaghan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 10:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- I will review this article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Is this going to be started? Wizardman 15:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
After reviewing this, the article looks good to me, and clearly meets the GA criteria. Hence, I am going to pass this one. Article is fully supported by sources, neutral, no POV issues, and contains enough detail to summarise the article. The image is CC-BY-SA-3.0, and has a OTRS template.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Passed. Good job. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)