This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Diannaa, a copyvio was started with this edit. Well, the Duplication Detector report would at least indicate to me that it's a copyvio rather than just close paraphrasing, but maybe it's the latter. If it's the former, how does one deal with the revision review given that quite a number of editors have edited in the meantime? Does that all need to be hidden, too? Schwede6603:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did some paraphrasing of that paragraph and of the following one, which also contained copyvio from the same source. All intervening edits from the initial copyvio to the point of removal have been revision-deleted. You might like to try https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/, as it's a superior copyvio detection tool. Thanks for reporting. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 03:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]