Talk:Georgia Public Broadcasting

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Radio Stations Mid‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comments

Please clean the rest of the analog transmitter numbers out of the station list. They are gone for good. -24.98.65.137 (talk) 09:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merges

I've reverted the merges of the local stations as undiscussed and non-consensual. The individual stations have plenty of history that was lost with the merge, and which should not covered here any way. Feel free to try to build a consensus to support merging, but please don't merge again without it. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GPB KIDS IS NOT 16:9 WIDESCREEN. FIX IT TO 4:3. I CAN TELL BY THE WAY THE E/I CIRCLE IS OVAL ON MY SCREEN IN FULL SCREEN MODE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.222.94 (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GPB Kids is Returning on .4. My GPB station on 29.4 is currently showing a test card with display "PBS Kids Channel". 72.148.3.214 (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia Public Broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110528045720/http://www.redandblack.com/2011/05/02/station-officially-changes-hands/ to http://www.redandblack.com/2011/05/02/station-officially-changes-hands/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dead source archive

Just in case anyone is wondering, the link to the article "Announcing the New GPB Knowledge Channel" seems to be permanently dead. However, I found a link to this ostensible WordPress archive of the article. I'm not sure it should be cited in the article, but I thought it should be left here for posterity. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 06:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. WGTV has not yet been merged (I need time to dig into its historical record) and may not be depending on its past record as an originating station. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing the merger of the articles on WGTV, WXGA-TV, WVAN-TV, WABW-TV, WNGH-TV, WCES-TV, WACS-TV, WJSP-TV and WMUM-TV into the GPB article.

The articles nominated are purely transmitters of the network and have always been. They have never had deviation from the network schedule in any way, and their history does not contain major information separate from the network; indeed, most of the pertinent information is already in the main GPB article. A transmitter of a large multi-station network like this, carrying the same programming, should only have an article if it has had a distinctly separate history, typically with other ownership or programming.

(This merge nomination does not include the GPB radio stations, some of which carry separate programming.) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@K-Johnson 127, Sammi Brie, Wcquidditch, Mrschimpf, and Tvtonightokc: See here: Talk:Georgia Public Broadcasting#2021 merger proposal Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support as these transmitters never had network variance. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Partial support - seems mostly logical, although the article for WGTV suggests that the station had some pre-GPB history and some divergent programming in the past. If there's consensus for the merger, it'd be worth making sure those details carry forward (if they're not in the GPB article already). Mlaffs (talk) 01:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Each article has some unique history of the transmitter sites, translators, and other information that would either be lost or clutter up the merged article. BilCat (talk) 04:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - More than 80% of information is simply replicated, the remaining 20% just needs to be re-organized. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.